ECTS Best Article Award Review-Clinical

Please indicate below the scores you have given for the application. Each category should be scored out of 10, with 10 being the highest score and 1 being the lowest. The marks will be averaged, and the award given to the highest scoring author.

Reviewer's name*
First Last
Reviewer's email*
Applicant's Name*
First Last
Conflict of interest*
- I confirm there are no conflict of interest with the applicant (such as same country, joint publication or grant in the last 5 years)
Hyphotesis: Importance*
Please enter a number from 1 to 10.
Hypothesis: Originality*
Please enter a number from 1 to 10.
Approach: Clarity of objectives*
Please enter a number from 1 to 10.
Approach: Appropriateness of methodology*
Please enter a number from 1 to 10.
Approach: Relevance of the results*
Please enter a number from 1 to 10.
Approach: Soundness of the conclusions*
Please enter a number from 1 to 10.
Potential Impact: Scientific, translational or clinical*
Please enter a number from 1 to 10.
Relevance: Skeletal biology/physiology Cause/treatment of bone disease*
Please enter a number from 1 to 10.
Comments*
Please give a detailed assessment suitable for transmission to the applicants as feedback. We are interested in your opinion on the importance, originality and impact of the article, the relevance to ECTS and bone disease, and the track record of the applicant in this area. Should you wish to make any confidential comments to the Chairman of the ECTS Grants Committee, these should be attached to this report on a separate sheet.
File
Max. file size: 256 MB.
CAPTCHA